Chapter Overview

Hebrew Truth Abandoned

Jesus led a Jewish renewal movement rooted in the Hebrew Scriptures, proclaiming the nearness of God's kingdom and calling Israel to repentance. Following his death, the disciples, led by his brother James in Jerusalem, remained observant Jews who viewed Jesus as the promised human Messiah, not God himself, while continuing to live according to the practices and obligations of their faith. Life in this movement rested on faithfulness to the Scriptures, trust in God, and a shared way of life rather than complex beliefs.

As the movement spread beyond its Jewish setting into the wider Roman world, this foundation was gradually eroded. Greek philosophical ideas, such as the immortal soul, divine mediators, and abstract concepts about God, replaced biblical teaching of the oneness of God and the concrete hope Jesus proclaimed. Pagan festivals and mystery-religion practices were adapted into Christian holy days. After Jerusalem was destroyed in AD 70, the original leaders were scattered. Gentile churches gained dominance, marginalising Jewish believers as heretics and reshaping the faith into a religion Jesus and his first followers would scarcely recognise. The shift from Aramaic to Greek transformed not only language but how believers understood Jesus' teachings and their relationship with God.

A Jewish prophet's urgent message of repentance and the coming kingdom became overlaid with Greek speculation and pagan ritual. Yet the original gospel remains preserved in the very Scriptures the church still holds, waiting to be recovered by those willing to look.

← Back

Death and Resurrection

One of the most significant Greek influences on Christianity was the immortal soul. This belief stood in sharp contrast to the Hebrew Scriptures, which present death as sleep until the future resurrection of the body on a renewed earth, a hope Jesus and his apostles shared. This hope traced back to Israel's prophets, who promised that God would one day raise the dead to bodily life in a transformed world. The earliest believers maintained this hope, looking forward to the resurrection of the dead at the last day.

Over the early centuries of the church, this understanding was displaced by a different view. Christian teaching came to assume that the soul departs the body at death, experiencing immediate reward or punishment in a disembodied state. This doctrine emerged from Greek philosophy, particularly from traditions that taught the soul to be eternal and the body merely its temporary prison. As this foreign concept took root, the biblical promise of bodily resurrection was marginalised, reinterpreted or ignored altogether.

The immortal soul doctrine redefines death itself. Where death should mean the end of life, it becomes merely transition to a new life. Where destruction should end existence, it perpetuates it. This echoes the serpent's original lie that man would not surely die. It transforms eternal life from a gift granted at resurrection into an inherent human quality. If souls enter their eternal state at death, judgement and resurrection become redundant. Yet the true hope is resurrection itself, when God restores bodily life to those who sleep.

← Back

The Oneness of God

Jesus lived a faith centred on one God alone, the Father, whom he called the only true God. He acted as God's perfect human representative, the anointed Messiah sent to speak God's words, perform God's works, and announce the coming kingdom. The earliest followers in Jerusalem maintained this understanding of one God while proclaiming that God had exalted Jesus to his right hand as Lord.

As the movement spread into the Greek speaking world, concepts of divine essences and multiple persons entered the picture. Through the church fathers and imperial councils, these were shaped into the doctrine of the Trinity, one God as three equal persons. When the concept resisted rational explanation, it was declared a holy mystery. Rejection met with condemnation, exile, and execution.

The opening of John's Gospel personified God's Word using the same poetic device Scripture uses to personify Wisdom in Proverbs. English translators chose 'he' and 'him' for the Greek logos, wrongly suggesting a distinct person. This transformed John's Hebrew personification into a literal pre-existent divine being. Other verses in John have been similarly misunderstood. Jesus himself declared that the Father was his God, maintaining the distinction between God and His anointed representative.

The Trinity established a precedent for defining mysteries beyond biblical teaching. This opened the door to further doctrinal errors in the Catholic Church, the Reformation, and modern Christianity. Though each generation rejected some corruptions, all retained the principle that incomprehensible mysteries define true faith, undermining Christianity's credibility to this day.

← Back

The Reformation Examined

The Reformation began as a challenge to corruption and excess within medieval Catholicism. Figures such as Luther questioned indulgences, purgatory, and priestly authority, emphasising faith and Scripture as the basis of salvation. The movement promised a return to biblical truth and wider access to Scripture, raising hopes of spiritual renewal.

Yet the reforms left many earlier theological assumptions untouched. Central doctrines shaped by Greek philosophy, including the belief in an immortal soul and the Trinity, were largely accepted without reconsideration. Drawing heavily on Augustine, the Reformers developed doctrines of original sin, total depravity and predestination, while retaining the inherited belief that Jesus was himself God.

The Reformation also unfolded in close alliance with political power, creating Christendom where church and state merged. Reformers made church attendance mandatory, enforced infant baptism as a civic obligation, and used state authority to suppress dissent. Calvin supported the execution of Michael Servetus for questioning the Trinity, while Reformers joined Catholics in executing Anabaptists who sought a non-violent faith independent of the state. The true heroes were these Anabaptists who rejected the merger of church and state.

These developments fragmented Christianity into competing movements and eroded confidence in biblical truth. The exhaustion from prolonged conflict produced not genuine tolerance but indifference to truth. Unproven scientific speculation and human reason became new objects of faith, with human intellect replacing Scripture as the source of authority.

← Back

Atonement and Reconciliation

Jesus taught reconciliation with God through repentance. During his ministry he freely forgave sins, as with the paralytic and the woman who anointed him. These acts occurred long before the cross, showing that God never required innocent blood before extending forgiveness.

Later Christian theology reframed reconciliation through penal substitution, the claim that God required punishment for sin and that Jesus was punished in man's place. This doctrine was developed by the Reformers, building on Aristotle's system of retributive justice. The doctrine required the Trinity to function. Only if Jesus were God himself could his death carry infinite value and avoid the charge of punishing an innocent third party.

The biblical pattern contradicts this entirely. Prophets such as Moses bore the sins of the people by identifying with them and interceding for them, never by receiving punishment in their place. Old Testament offerings could be as simple as flour, acts of worship that moved hearts toward repentance, reflecting devotion rather than substitutionary payment. God sought the heart of the giver, not a transfer of guilt. Jesus bore sins through this same pattern of identification and compassion, not through receiving punishment.

Scripture presents atonement as encompassing Jesus' entire life, death, and resurrection. His life embodied righteousness, his death expressed obedience, and his resurrection defeated death, freeing man from powers opposed to God. Penal substitution originates in pagan religion and distorts God's character, turning faith into a legal transaction. Returning to the biblical pattern of forgiveness through genuine repentance restores the relational reconciliation Jesus proclaimed.

← Back

Modern Revival Movements

The Charismatic movement emerged in the early 1900s with revivals like Azusa Street, promising supernatural gifts such as tongues for worldwide missions. When early missionaries like Alfred and Lillian Garr found their supposed gift of Bengali utterly ineffective in India, leaders redefined tongues from real languages to private heavenly speech, shifting focus from evangelism to personal experience.

This initiated three distinct waves of development. First came the Pentecostal emphasis on Holy Spirit baptism and signs. Then the Charismatic spread into mainline churches with contemporary worship and informal styles. Finally the Third Wave brought kingdom theology, believing the church must establish God's rule on earth before Jesus returns, often through spiritual warfare and end-time revival expectations.

The focus increasingly became experience itself. Spiritual life was measured by intensity of manifestations rather than genuine faithfulness, while techniques for producing response shaped worship and preaching, drawing more from psychology and crowd dynamics than from Scripture. Personal revelation increasingly replaced careful interpretation of Scripture, making the experiences of others difficult to question without causing offence.

In the first century, biblical gifts authenticated the apostolic message. Tongues were actual foreign languages understood by listeners, and healings were immediate, complete and verifiable. No such gifts are evident today.

The movement persists in expecting an imminent worldwide revival that Scripture does not promise. Rather than recovering the message Jesus preached, revival movements reframe faith around signs, success and personal fulfilment, producing short-lived enthusiasm that ultimately disappoints.

← Back

Prophecy and Fulfilment

Modern Christianity approaches prophecy with the assumption that biblical predictions concern distant future events. This interpretation, known as futurism, requires redefinition of language, making words like 'soon' and 'this generation' span millennia.

A central misreading underlies this distortion. Daniel 7:13 describes the Son of Man coming to the Ancient of Days in heaven to receive dominion. Futurist interpretation reverses this direction, reading the passage as a descent from heaven to earth, thus misinterpreting every New Testament passage that quotes it, including the Olivet Discourse.

Jesus warned of Jerusalem's destruction with specific signs and instructions for escape. When Roman armies surrounded the city in AD 70, his words proved accurate as the temple was reduced to rubble and the religious establishment that condemned him was obliterated. This vindication fulfilled what Daniel described. Jesus received authority in heaven, demonstrated through judgement on those who rejected him.

Questions remain, but they do not justify reinterpreting the plain meaning of Scripture to resolve apparent tensions. Yet futurism does exactly this, redefining time markers and reversing prophetic direction to postpone fulfilment. It originated with John Nelson Darby in the nineteenth century and spread through the Scofield Reference Bible, a publication facilitated by political interests seeking Christian support for a Jewish homeland. The resulting theology reshaped Christian expectations of history and influenced Western attitudes toward the Middle East, with many believers convinced that supporting modern Israeli actions constitutes obedience to God, awaiting future events that Scripture places in the past.

← Back

Return to the Faith of Jesus

Jesus affirmed a faith rooted in Abraham's trust and obedience, walking with the one God in simple response to his word, without complex doctrines or rituals. He called people to repentance and righteous living, drawing from the Law while emphasising its timeless moral principles.

Centuries of additions buried this, layering Greek ideas, pagan practices, and institutional power over the original message. Churches today often preserve these distortions as essential, making recovery feel like loss when it actually frees believers from confusion.

The Jerusalem church under James preserved a thoroughly Jewish understanding. Every member remained zealous for the law. James ruled that Gentiles need not be circumcised, recognising the distinction between universal requirements and covenant markers specific to Israel. His letter emphasises practical righteousness over doctrinal formulation, insisting that faith without works is dead.

Returning means aligning with what Jesus lived, leaving churches that teach the Trinity, and prioritising Scripture over tradition. It demands honest self-examination, willingness to question inherited beliefs, and courage to face isolation from communities tied to error, even when this means losing the fellowship and support provided by church.

This faith remains accessible in the Hebrew Scriptures that Jesus himself endorsed as authoritative. These texts formed the entirety of what Jesus considered Scripture, yet Christianity has marginalized them as incomplete and superseded. The Hebrew Scriptures teach God's oneness, his readiness to forgive the repentant, and the hope of resurrection. Recovery requires returning to these Scriptures Jesus endorsed, reading them as he read them, and allowing them to correct the innovations that came later.

← Back